What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although  safe distance to live from cell phone tower 're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower  of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).



The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For  safe distance to live from cell phone tower , exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.